The Court declared the application inadmissible for being manifestly ill-founded. The case concerned the applicants’ immediate removal to Morocco after they had climbed the border fences between Morocco and Ceuta. The Court stated that the case was similar to N.D. and N.T. v. Spain, where the ECtHR had already declared that there had been no violation of the Convention nor Article 4 of Protocol No. 4.
Status NOT FINAL
Relevant Law Article 3, 13 Article 4 Protocol 4
Found for Inadmissible